When the US negotiated peace with American Indians just a few years after the American Revolution, they used religiously-inspired, culturally relevant symbols to “bury the hatchet.” However, the secularist approach to contemporary Western foreign and security policies has largely overlooked, or contemptuously disregarded, the highly religious context of war zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Thus, it is time to consider a religious approach to peacemaking in Afghanistan based on Islamic concepts of arbitration and mediation (sulh). This paper argues that the larger secularist bias in Western foreign policies have made the West blind to the religious aspects of contemporary global affairs and reports on the one-size-fits-all Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) programs instituted in Afghanistan following the Tokyo Donor conference of 2003. Finally, this paper articulates Islamic religious concepts that could be the basis for establishing reconciliation between warring parties in Afghanistan. For the full article by Eric Patterson in the 5th Issue of the Journal of Inter-Religious Dialogue, please click here.
2 thoughts on “Bury the Bloody Hatchet: Secularism, Islam, and Reconciliation in Afghanistan”
Comments are closed.
This paper is excellent. I hope it is widely read – and governments take advantage of the wisdom in it. I agree with the arguments for fundamental flaws in the approach to negotiations so far and hope this paper’s more appropriate suggestion of a new direction is considered. Dialogue and reconciliation informed in part by Islamic principles… I’m not sure I haven’t heard this sort of argument before though, from the NZ Department of Islamic Affairs (not sure of the exact title), from the experts on religion there.